NR 505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

NR 505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion
Sample Answer for NR 505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion Included After Question

The Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion assignment is due
Sunday at the end of week 7 at 11:59pm MT. The guidelines and rubric are located below and also in
Course Resources. Please note that for this assignment you are to include your Week 2 and Week 5
content along with the new content for this week.  Only the new content will be graded.  Having a final
completed document of your EBP project will assist you in your future Concluding Graduate Experience
courses within your specialty track.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion
Title: NR 505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete their MSN EBP proposal. This
assignment includes the final sections of the proposal which are data collection, analysis, evaluation,
dissemination of results, and conclusion.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO #1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care
in diverse healthcare settings. (PO # 1)
CO #2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve
healthcare outcomes. (PO #2, 5)
CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and
critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)
CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives
that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)
Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Seven
Total Points: 150 points
Requirements
Description of the Assignment
For this assignment, the student will complete MSN EBP project proposal by including the final sections
of data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.
Criteria for Content
1. The entire proposal paper (excluding the title page and reference pages) should be maximum of
45 pages. This includes assignments from Week 2 and Week 5 along with the new content you
will be writing for the Week 7 assignment. Points will be lost for exceeding this length
requirement.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference pages must follow APA guidelines as
found in the 6 th  edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the
paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
3. The paper should be presented in the following ordered sections:
 Title Page
 Overview of evidenced-based practice project
 Identification of nursing concern to be improved
 PICOT/PICo question and literature search
 Theoretical framework
 Research literature support
 Research approach and design
 Sampling
 Proposed implementation with a change model
 Data collection
 Analysis
 Evaluation
 Dissemination of Results
 Conclusion
 References
4. Data Collection: In this section, students provide a comprehensive and detailed description regarding
how data are to be collected. The required content includes:
A. For quantitative design the required content includes:
 Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
 Identify the data collection points
 Explain the length of time for data collection
 Explain all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation,
biophysiologic)
 Describe 2 (two) methods that will be useful in enhancing data quality
 Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method.
B. For qualitative design the required content includes:

 Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts)
 Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
 Explain the data collection points
 Explain the length of time for data collection
 Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation
 Describe 2 (two) methods that would be used to enhance data quality
 Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
4. Analysis: In this section, students provide a detailed explanation on how data will be analyzed.
A. For quantitative data the required content includes:
 Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP
proposal
 Describe one type of inferential statistics and their use in this EBP proposal
 Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
B. For qualitative data the required content includes:
 Explain how data analysis is organized
 Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal
 Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design
 Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
5. Evaluation: In this section, students will present information regarding methods useful to
objectively determine if outcomes from implementing this proposed EBP proposal would be
positive for stakeholders as well as the nursing practice area reflected in their specialty track.
The required content includes:
 Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience
improved outcome(s) from implementing this project
 Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your
specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
6. Dissemination of Results: In this section, students will identify specific methods that may be
used to share the results from successful implementation of this EBP proposal. The required
content includes:
 Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders
 Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice
area at the facility, community, state, and national levels

7. Conclusion: In this section, the student will identify a summary of their EBP project as well as
consider the potential contribution to their specialty track practice setting. The required content
includes:
 Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project
 Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty
track practice and identified practice setting
8. Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
1. The final proposal paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should not exceed 45
(forty-five) pages. Points will be lost for not meeting this length requirement.
2. Headings are required and listed in above. All headings should be formatted following APA
requirements
3. Title page, body of paper, reference page(s), and appendix must follow APA guidelines as found
in the 6 th  edition of the manual.
4. Provide all of your references; formatted in APA style, as reference page(s).

Rubric
Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion
Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeData
Collection

35.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
exceptional and
included all of
the following
elements: For
quantitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on
how data

31.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
good, but was
superficial in
places and
included all of
the following
elements: For
quantitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Provide a
detailed

28.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
minimally
demonstrated in
the all of the
following
elements For
quantitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on

13.0 pts
Presentation of
information in
one or two of
the following
elements fails to
meet
expectations:
For quantitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on

0.0 pts
Presentation of
information is
unsatisfactory in
three or more of
the following
elements: For
quantitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on
how data

35.0 pts

collection will
occur • Identify
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the all
source(s) of data
(i.e. self-report,
questionnaires,
structured
observation,
biophysiologic)
• Describe 2
(two) methods
that will be used
to enhance data
quality • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Describe the
type of data to
be collected (i.e.
observation,
interview,
artifacts) •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on
how data
collection will

explanation on
how data
collection will
occur • Identify
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the all
source(s) of data
(i.e. self-report,
questionnaires,
structured
observation,
biophysiologic)
• Describe 2
(two) methods
that will be used
to enhance data
quality • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Describe the
type of data to
be collected (i.e.
observation,
interview,
artifacts) •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on

how data
collection will
occur • Identify
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the all
source(s) of data
(i.e. self-report,
questionnaires,
structured
observation,
biophysiologic)
• Describe 2
(two) methods
that will be used
to enhance data
quality • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Describe the
type of data to
be collected (i.e.
observation,
interview,
artifacts) •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on
how data

how data
collection will
occur • Identify
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the all
source(s) of data
(i.e. self-report,
questionnaires,
structured
observation,
biophysiologic)
• Describe 2
(two) methods
that will be used
to enhance data
quality • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Describe the
type of data to
be collected (i.e.
observation,
interview,
artifacts) •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on
how data

collection will
occur • Identify
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the all
source(s) of data
(i.e. self-report,
questionnaires,
structured
observation,
biophysiologic)
• Describe 2
(two) methods
that will be used
to enhance data
quality • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative
design the
required
content
includes: •
Describe the
type of data to
be collected (i.e.
observation,
interview,
artifacts) •
Provide a
detailed
explanation on
how data
collection will

occur • Explain
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the
proposed
method to
achieve data
saturation •
Describe 2 (two)
methods that
would be useful
in enhancing
data quality •
Use scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

how data
collection will
occur • Explain
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the
proposed
method to
achieve data
saturation •
Describe 2 (two)
methods that
would be useful
in enhancing
data quality •
Use scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

collection will
occur • Explain
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the
proposed
method to
achieve data
saturation •
Describe 2 (two)
methods that
would be useful
in enhancing
data quality •
Use scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

collection will
occur • Explain
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the
proposed
method to
achieve data

NR 505 Week 7 Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

saturation •
Describe 2 (two)
methods that
would be useful
in enhancing
data quality •
Use scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

occur • Explain
the data
collection points
• Explain the
length of time
for data
collection •
Explain the
proposed
method to
achieve data
saturation •
Describe 2 (two)
methods that
would be useful
in enhancing
data quality •
Use scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeAnalysis

25.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
exceptional and
included all of
the following
elements: For

22.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
good, but was
superficial in
places and
included all of

20.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
minimally
demonstrated in
the all of the
following

10.0 pts
Presentation of
information in
one of the
following
elements fails to
meet

0.0 pts
Presentation of
information is
unsatisfactory in
two or more of
the following
elements: For

25.0 pts

quantitative
data the
required
content
includes: •
Discuss
descriptive
statistics and
their use to
explain the
characteristics
of the sample of
this EBP
proposal •
Describe one
type of
inferential
statistics and its
use in this EBP
proposal • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative data
the required
content
includes: •
Explain how
data analysis is
organized •
Discuss the use
of themes and
coding for this
EBP proposal •
Explain
triangulation
and its
relevance to this
qualitative

the following
elements: For
quantitative
data the
required
content
includes: •
Discuss
descriptive
statistics and
their use to
explain the
characteristics
of the sample of
this EBP
proposal •
Describe one
type of
inferential
statistics and its
use in this EBP
proposal • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative data
the required
content
includes: •
Explain how
data analysis is
organized •
Discuss the use
of themes and
coding for this
EBP proposal •
Explain
triangulation
and its

elements: For
quantitative
data the
required
content
includes: •
Discuss
descriptive
statistics and
their use to
explain the
characteristics
of the sample of
this EBP
proposal •
Describe one
type of
inferential
statistics and its
use in this EBP
proposal • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative data
the required
content
includes: •
Explain how
data analysis is
organized •
Discuss the use
of themes and
coding for this
EBP proposal •
Explain
triangulation
and its
relevance to this

expectations:
For quantitative
data the
required
content
includes: •
Discuss
descriptive
statistics and
their use to
explain the
characteristics
of the sample of
this EBP
proposal •
Describe one
type of
inferential
statistics and its
use in this EBP
proposal • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative data
the required
content
includes: •
Explain how
data analysis is
organized •
Discuss the use
of themes and
coding for this
EBP proposal •
Explain
triangulation
and its
relevance to this

quantitative
data the
required
content
includes: •
Discuss
descriptive
statistics and
their use to
explain the
characteristics
of the sample of
this EBP
proposal •
Describe one
type of
inferential
statistics and its
use in this EBP
proposal • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method For
qualitative data
the required
content
includes: •
Explain how
data analysis is
organized •
Discuss the use
of themes and
coding for this
EBP proposal •
Explain
triangulation
and its
relevance to this
qualitative

design • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

relevance to this
qualitative
design • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

qualitative
design • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

qualitative
design • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

design • Use
scholarly
references to
provide
information
regarding
selected data
collection
method

This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeEvaluation

20.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
exceptional and
included all of
the following
elements: •
Describe how
each of the
stakeholders
identified
earlier in this
EBP proposal
will experience
improved
outcome(s)
from
implementing
this project •
Describe 2 (two)
changes or
improvements
to nursing
practice that
may result in
the your
specialty track
area at the
micro level if

18.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
good, but was
superficial in
places and
included all of
the following
elements: •
Describe how
each of the
stakeholders
identified
earlier in this
EBP proposal
will experience
improved
outcome(s)
from
implementing
this project •
Describe 2 (two)
changes or
improvements
to nursing
practice that
may result in
the your
specialty track

16.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
minimally
demonstrated in
the all of the
following
elements: •
Describe how
each of the
stakeholders
identified
earlier in this
EBP proposal
will experience
improved
outcome(s)
from
implementing
this project •
Describe 2 (two)
changes or
improvements
to nursing
practice that
may result in
the your
specialty track
area at the

8.0 pts
Presentation of
information in
one of the
following
elements fails to
meet
expectations: •
Describe how
each of the
stakeholders
identified
earlier in this
EBP proposal
will experience
improved
outcome(s)
from
implementing
this project •
Describe 2 (two)
changes or
improvements
to nursing
practice that
may result in
the your
specialty track
area at the

0.0 pts
Presentation of
information is
unsatisfactory in
two of the
following
elements: •
Describe how
each of the
stakeholders
identified
earlier in this
EBP proposal
will experience
improved
outcome(s)
from
implementing
this project •
Describe 2 (two)
changes or
improvements
to nursing
practice that
may result in
the your
specialty track
area at the
micro level if

20.0 pts

this EBP project
was to be
implemented

area at the
micro level if
this EBP project
was to be
implemented

micro level if
this EBP project
was to be
implemented

micro level if
this EBP project
was to be
implemented

this EBP project
was to be
implemented

This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeDissemination
of Results

20.0 pts
Presentation of
information
was
exceptional and
included all of
the following
elements: •
Discuss how
the results of
this EBP project
can be shared
with
stakeholders •
Discuss how
the results of
this EBP project
can be shared
with members
of your future
practice area at
the facility,
community,
state, and
national levels

18.0 pts
Presentation of
information
was good, but
was superficial
in places and
included all of
the following
elements: •
Discuss how the
results of this
EBP project can
be shared with
stakeholders •
Discuss how the
results of this
EBP project can
be shared with
members of
your future
practice area at
the facility,
community,
state, and
national levels

16.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
minimally
demonstrated in
the all of the
following
elements: •
Discuss how the
results of this
EBP project can
be shared with
stakeholders •
Discuss how the
results of this
EBP project can
be shared with
members of your
future practice
area at the
facility,
community,
state, and
national levels

8.0 pts
Presentation of
information in
one of the
following
elements fails to
meet
expectations: •
Discuss how the
results of this
EBP project can
be shared with
stakeholders •
Discuss how the
results of this
EBP project can
be shared with
members of
your future
practice area at
the facility,
community,
state, and
national levels

0.0 pts
Presentation of
information is
unsatisfactory in
two of the
following
elements: •
Discuss how the
results of this
EBP project can
be shared with
stakeholders •
Discuss how the
results of this
EBP project can
be shared with
members of your
future practice
area at the
facility,
community,
state, and
national levels

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeConclusion

10.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
exceptional and
included all of

9.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
good, but was
superficial in

8.0 pts
Presentation of
information was
minimally
demonstrated in
4.0 pts
Presentation of
information in
one of the
following

0.0 pts
Presentation of
information is
unsatisfactory in
two of the

10.0 pts

the following
elements: •
Provide a
comprehensive
summary of key
points from this
EBP proposal
project •
Provide a
summary of the
potential
contributions of
this EBP
proposal project
to your specialty
track practice
and identified
practice setting

places and
included all of
the following
elements: •
Provide a
comprehensive
summary of key
points from this
EBP proposal
project •
Provide a
summary of the
potential
contributions of
this EBP
proposal project
to your specialty
track practice
and identified
practice setting

the all of the
following
elements: •
Provide a
comprehensive
summary of key
points from this
EBP proposal
project •
Provide a
summary of the
potential
contributions of
this EBP
proposal project
to your specialty
track practice
and identified
practice setting

elements fails to
meet
expectations: •
Provide a
comprehensive
summary of key
points from this
EBP proposal
project •
Provide a
summary of the
potential
contributions of
this EBP
proposal project
to your specialty
track practice
and identified
practice setting

following
elements: •
Provide a
comprehensive
summary of key
points from this
EBP proposal
project •
Provide a
summary of the
potential
contributions of
this EBP
proposal project
to your specialty
track practice
and identified
practice setting

This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomePaper
Specifications

10.0 pts
This section
included all of
the following: •
Paper meets
length
requirements of
not exceeding
45pages
excluding title
and reference
pages •
Headings are
required and
listed above. All
headings should
be formatted
following APA
requirements A
9.0 pts
This section
included three
of the following:
• Paper meets
length
requirements of
not exceeding
45 pages
excluding title
and reference
pages •
Headings are
required and
listed above. All
headings should
be formatted
following APA
requirements • .
8.0 pts
This section
included only
two of the
following: •
Paper meets
length
requirements of
not exceeding
45 pages
excluding title
and reference
pages •
Headings are
required and
listed above. All
headings should
be formatted
following APA

4.0 pts
This section
included only
one of the
following: •
Paper meets
length
requirements of
not exceeding
45 pages
excluding title
and reference
pages •
Headings are
required and
listed above. All
headings should
be formatted
following APA

0.0 pts
This section
included none
of the following:
• Paper meets
length
requirements of
not exceeding
45pages
excluding title
and reference
pages •
Headings are
required and
listed above. All
headings should
be formatted
following APA
requirements •

10.0 pts

dictionary
(except for
Definition
section),
required
textbooks for
this course and
Chamberlain
College of
Nursing lesson
information,
may NOT be
used as
scholarly
references for
this assignment.
• References are
current – within
a 5-year time
frame unless a
valid rationale is
provided and
the instructor
has approved
them.

• A dictionary
(except for
Definition
section),
required
textbooks for
this course and
Chamberlain
College of
Nursing lesson
information,
may NOT be
used as
scholarly
references for
this assignment.
• References are
current – within
a 5-year time
frame unless a
valid rationale is
provided and
the instructor
has approved
them.

requirements •
A dictionary
(except for
Definition
section),
required
textbooks for
this course and
Chamberlain
College of
Nursing lesson
information,
may NOT be
used as
scholarly
references for
this assignment.
• References are
current – within
a 5-year time
frame unless a
valid rationale is
provided and
the instructor
has approved
them.

requirements •
A dictionary
(except for
Definition
section),
required
textbooks for
this course and
Chamberlain
College of
Nursing lesson
information,
may NOT be
used as
scholarly
references for
this assignment.
• References are
current – within
a 5-year time
frame unless a
valid rationale is
provided and
the instructor
has approved
them.

Headings are
present and
consistent with
APA format. • A
dictionary
(except for
Definition
section),
required
textbooks for
this course and
Chamberlain
College of
Nursing lesson
information,
may NOT be
used as
scholarly
references for
this assignment.
• References are
current – within
a 5-year time
frame unless a
valid rationale is
provided and
the instructor
has approved
them.

This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeAPA Style

10.0 pts
APA guidelines,
as per the 6th
edition of the
manual, are
demonstrated
for the • title
page, • running
head, • body of

9.0 pts
APA guidelines,
as per the 6th
edition of the
manual, are
demonstrated
for the • title
page, • running
head, • body of
8.0 pts
APA guidelines,
as per the 6th
edition of the
manual, are
demonstrated
for the • title
page, • running
head, • body of
4.0 pts
APA guidelines,
as per the 6th
edition of the
manual, are
demonstrated
for the • title
page, • running
head, • body of
0.0 pts
APA guidelines,
as per the 6th
edition of the
manual, are
demonstrated
for the • title
page, • running
head, • body of

10.0 pts

paper (including
margins,
headings. font,
etc.), and
reference page
• One deduction
for each type of
APA format
error 0 to 1 APA
error was
present

paper (including
margins,
headings, font,
etc.), and
reference page
• One deduction
for each type of
APA format
error 2 – 3 APA
errors were
present

paper (including
margins,
headings, font,
etc.), and
reference page
• One deduction
for each type of
APA format
error 4 – 5 APA
were are
present

paper (including
margins,
headings, font,
etc.), and
reference page
• One deduction
for each type of
APA format
error 6 – 7 APA
were are
present

paper (including
margins,
headings, font,
etc.), and
reference page •
One deduction
for each type of
APA format
error 8 or
greater APA
errors were
present

This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeCitations

10.0 pts
There were 0-1
errors in the
crediting of ideas,
and information
that contributed
to knowledge
Permission to use
references older
than 5 years was
obtained from
faculty.

9.0 pts
There were 2-3
errors in the
crediting of ideas,
and information
that contributed
to knowledge
Permission to use
references older
than 5 years was
NOT obtained
from faculty.

8.0 pts
There were 4-5
errors in the
crediting of
ideas, and
information
that
contributed to
knowledge

4.0 pts
There were 6-7
errors in the
crediting of
ideas, and
information
that
contributed to
knowledge

0.0 pts
There were 8
or greater
errors in the
crediting of
ideas, and
information
that
contributed to
knowledge

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeWriting
Quality

10.0 pts
1–2 errors or
exceptions to
the rules of
grammar,
spelling, word
usage,
punctuation and
other aspects of
formal written
work as found
in the 6th
edition of the

9.0 pts
3 – 4 errors or
exceptions to
the rules of
grammar,
spelling, word
usage,
punctuation and
other aspects of
formal written
work as found
in the 6th
edition of the

8.0 pts
5 – 6 errors or
exceptions to
the rules of
grammar,
spelling, word
usage,
punctuation and
other aspects of
formal written
work as found
in the 6th
edition of the

4.0 pts
7 – 8 errors or
exceptions to
the rules of
grammar,
spelling, word
usage,
punctuation and
other aspects of
formal written
work as found
in the 6th
edition of the

0.0 pts
9 or greater
errors or
exceptions to
the rules of
grammar,
spelling, word
usage,
punctuation and
other aspects of
formal written
work as found in
the 6th edition

10.0 pts

APA manual APA manual APA manual APA manual of the APA
manual

Total Points: 150.0
PreviousNext

FNPs Role in Reducing Falls in Long-term Care Facilities

Week 7 Proposal
Fride Wandji
Chamberlain College of Nursing

NR505: Advanced Research Methods: Evidence-Based Practice

June 17, 2018

Data Collection

The restated PICo question is: “What are nurse practitioners (NPs) experiences in
providing care to patients who have fallen in an LTC and fractured bones in the United States?”
The data collection method that applies the best for my research topic is a quantitative survey/
questionnaire (Choy, 2014). Surveys are cost effective and can be mailed or emailed to
participants. Disseminating the surveys by email is a much faster process than mailing the
surveys to participants, but each method will all participants are provided an equal opportunity to
join in the survey process. The online option allows for a large, diverse population of NPs to be
sampled. The ability to survey large numbers of respondents reduces geographical dependence.
The strength of the survey or questionnaire is that it contains closed-ended questions and the
answer options are provided. A weakness with the survey/questionnaire is the questions and
answers are basic and lack detail. However, the researcher can ask numerous questions about a
subject, allowing for flexibility in data analysis. The researcher can also add a section of open –
ended questions that allow for short answers. According to Choy (2014), open-ended survey
questions can be turned into qualitative data. The best thing about surveys or questionnaires is
that from the collected data, researchers can infer respondents’ attitudes, opinions, beliefs,
values, and behavior and can generalize or transfer this information across multiple situations

(Choy, 2014). The survey/questionnaire will have a pre-test/post-test design. With this method,
the same research participants are surveyed on the same variables at multiple times during the
study.
To collect the data, researchers will assemble a team of two or three people. This team
will call the selected research participants and ask if they would prefer to receive the survey by
mail or via email. The team will then send out the first survey (pre-test) to each participant via
each respective method chosen. Once the completed surveys have been returned, data collection
team members will file the first set of surveys under “completed surveys: phase one.” This
process will need to be duplicated three times. Data collection team members will contact
participants who did not return completed surveys to ask if they still want to be a part of the
study and schedule a time for completed surveys to be returned.
Data Collection Points and Length of Data Collection
As established by pre-test/post-test design, the survey data will be collected at three
separate times during the study: at the start of the study, the midpoint of the study, and the end of
the study. The survey format and questions will remain the same during each time of
dissemination. Ponto (2015) states to guarantee that some data is gathered from as many
participants as possible and to ensure consistency of answers per survey