Cheap essays, research papers, dissertations.NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay
Sample Answer for NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay Included After Question
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay
Assessment Description
In 1,250-1,500 words, discuss the implementation plan for your evidence-based practice project proposal. When required, create the appropriate form, table, image, or graph to fully illustrate that aspect of the intervention plan and include them in an appendix of your paper. You will use the implementation plan, including the associated documents in your appendices, in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Include the following:
Describe the setting and access to potential subjects. If there is a need for a consent or approval form, then one must be created. Include a draft of the form as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay
Create a timeline. Make sure the timeline is general enough that it can be implemented at any date. Based on the timeline you created, describe the amount of time needed to complete this project. Include a draft of the timeline as an appendix at the end of your paper.
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay
Develop a budget and resource list. Consider the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Based on the budget and resource list you developed: (a) describe the resources (human, fiscal, and other) or changes needed in the implementation of the solution; (b) outline the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer-related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Include a draft of the budget and resource list as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Explain whether you would select a qualitative or quantitative design to collect data and evaluate the effectiveness of your evidence-based practice project proposal. Provide rationale to support your selection.
Describe the methods and instruments (questionnaire, scale, or test) to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Include the method or instrument as an appendix at the end of your paper. NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay
Explain the process for delivering the intervention and indicate if any training will be needed.
Discuss the stakeholders that are needed to implement the plan.
Consider all of the aspects of your implementation plan and discuss potential barriers or challenges to the plan. Propose strategies for overcoming these.
Establish the feasibility of the implementation plan.
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Topic 5 DQ 2
GO TO DISCUSSION
Identify two stakeholder barriers you might experience during the implementation phase of your evidence-based practice project. What strategies can you implement to gain stakeholder support for the project implementation. Provide a suggestion you would give to a colleague who is struggling with obtaining stakeholder support.
Cohesive Collaboration is important to the survival of and success of an organization. Implementation plans can face numerous challenges as a result of lack of knowledge of the problems hurting an organization. This lack of knowledge is common in many organizations were leaders and management are disconnected from day to day operations that help to run the organization. When a person rises through the ranks of the organization into a leadership role they have knowledge of and experience that other managers lack if they hired from the outside. The person who rises through the ranks has more understanding of the how the organization works, the weakness that exist, the organizations strength and how the organization needs to function in order to survive. Where there is s disconnect between stakeholders in higher positions and those working the day to day operations, noting will get done.
Some of the things that one might experience during the implementation phase are resistance and timing. “Lack of time is often cited as a barrier to implementing EBP. In addition, uncertainty or lack of knowledge about the EBP process is also a barrier, which includes critiquing and appraising the literature related to the clinical problem being addressed” (Ginex, 2018). In busy hospitals lack of time to study and understand new changes and policies can be a barrier. On time of this, resistance to change can also be a barrier. In there is already a flow that nurses are accustomed to even if it is chaotic, having to change that flow requires learning something new or changing ones workflow habits and that can cause resistance to change. NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay
The one suggestion I would give to a fellow colleague would be for them to ask questions, slow down the pace in order for them to understand the new policy and give themselves time to become accustom to it and to always remember that it will take them time to learn something new before they can master it.
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay Reference:
Ginex, P. (2018). Overcome Barriers to Applying an Evidence-Based Process for Practice Change. Retrieved from https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/overcome-barriers-to-applying-an-evidence-based-process-for-practice-change
Start Date
Sep 09, 2021 12:00 AM
Due Date
Sep 13, 2021 11:59 PM
Points
5
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
Identify two stakeholder barriers you might experience during the implementation phase of your evidence-based practice project. What strategies can you implement to gain stakeholder support for the project implementation? Provide a suggestion you would give to a colleague who is struggling with obtaining stakeholder support.
Objectives:
Propose an implementation plan for the evidence-based practice proposal.
Propose strategies for overcoming barriers to the implementation of the evidence-based practice proposal.
Assessments
Collapse All
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Implementation Plan
SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT
Requires LopesWrite
Start Date
Sep 09, 2021 12:00 AM
Due Date
Sep 15, 2021 11:59 PM
Points
120
Rubric
View Rubric
Status
Upcoming
Week 5 Participation
GO TO DISCUSSION
Start Date
Sep 09, 2021 12:00 AM
Due Date
Sep 15, 2021 11:59 PM
Points
20
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
There is no description for this assessment.
Resources
Collapse All
Strategies, Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Community Nursing: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review and Qualitative Synthesis
Read “Strategies, Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Community Nursing: A Systematic Mixed-Stu
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/strategies-facilitators-barriers-implementation/docview/2186617926/se-2?accountid=7374
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Read Chapter 25 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
View Resource
30 Safe Practices for Better Health Care
Read “30 Safe Practices for Better Health Care,” located in the Archive section of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
… Read More
http://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/errors-safety/30safe/30-safe-practices.html
Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists
Read “Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists,” by Boehm, Stolldorf, and Jeffery, from
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/implementation-science-training-resources-nurses/docview/2338944244/se-2?accountid=7374
Improving 3-Hour Sepsis Bundled Care Outcomes: Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Sepsis Protocol in the Emergency Department
Read “Improving 3-Hour Sepsis Bundled Care Outcomes: Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Sepsis Protocol in the Emergency Department,
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/improving-3-hour-sepsis-bundled-care-outcomes/docview/2312493328/se-2?accountid=7374
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice
Review Chapter 1 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.
View Resource
Center for Theory of Change
Explore the Center for Theory of Change website.
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Read Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
View Resource
The Teach Back Project: A System-Wide Evidence Based Practice
Read “The Teach Back Project: A System-Wide Evidence Based Practice,” by Klingbeil and Gibson, from Journal of Pediatric Nurs
… Read More
https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0882596317305523
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Implementation Plan – Rubric
Collapse All
Setting and Access to Potential Subjects
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Description of setting and access to potential subjects; consent or approval form is attached in an appendix, if needed.
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are clearly described. A well-developed and accurate consent or approval form is attached correctly in an appendix.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are described. A consent or approval form is needed and attached in an appendix. Minor revision may be needed on the form or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are generally described. Some additional information is needed. A consent or approval form is attached but requires some revision; the form is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are only partially described. A consent or approval form is attached but contains significant errors; the form is not attached in an appendix.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are not described. A consent or approval form needs to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.
Timeline
9.6 points
Criteria Description
Description of time required; draft of timeline is attached in an appendix.
5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is clearly described and general enough to be implemented at any date. A well-developed timeline is attached correctly in an appendix.
4. 4: Good
8.83 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is described and general enough to be implemented at any date. Minor revision may be needed on the timeline, or to correct formatting issues in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is generally described. Some additional information is needed. A timeline is attached but requires some revision; the timeline is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is only partially described. A timeline is attached but contains significant errors; the timeline is not attached in an appendix. NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan Essay
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is not described. A timeline needs to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.
Budget and Resource List
9.6 points
Criteria Description
Description of resources or changes required; outline of cost and budget and resource list are attached in an appendix.
5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
A detailed description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are clearly presented. A well-developed budget and resource list are attached correctly in an appendix.
4. 4: Good
8.83 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are presented. Minor revision maybe needed on the budget or resource list, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are generally presented. Some additional information is needed. A budget and resource list are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are partially presented. A budget and resource list are attached but contain significant errors; the list is not attached in an appendix.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are omitted. A budget and resource list need to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.
Research Design
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Quantitative or qualitative design to collect data and evaluate effectiveness.
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
A research design is selected. A thorough explanation for how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
A research design is selected. An explanation of how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Adequate rationale is provided for support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
A research design is selected. A general explanation of how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. More rational is needed for support.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
A research design is selected. It is unclear how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Research design is not selected.
Methods and Instruments
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Methods or instruments used for monitoring implementation.
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are described. Minor revision may be needed for the methods or instruments, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are thoroughly described. The methods or instruments are accurate and correctly attached in an appendix.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are summarized, but more information is needed. The methods or instruments are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are only partially discussed. A methods or instruments are attached but contain significant errors; the methods or instruments are not attached in an appendix.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The methods or instruments are omitted. The methods or instruments need to be created and attached in an appendix.
Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is summarized. More information or support is needed.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is explained. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is thoroughly explained. Strong rationale is provided for support.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The process for delivering the intervention is only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The process for delivering the intervention is omitted.
Stakeholders for Implementation
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Stakeholders for Implementation
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
A thorough discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
Stakeholders needed to implement the plan are omitted.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
A summary of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. More information or support is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
An adequate discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is incomplete.
Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are thoroughly discussed and clear strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are discussed and strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are only partially discussed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are summarized. General strategies for overcoming these are presented.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are not discussed.
Evidence of Feasibility
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Evidence of Feasibility
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is thoroughly discussed. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is only partially discussed.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is outlined. More information or support is needed to demonstrate the feasibility of the plan.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is not discussed.
Required Sources
6 points
Criteria Description
Required Sources
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Number of required sources is only partially met.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not included.
Thesis Development and Purpose
8.4 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
9.6 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good
8.83 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing
6 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format
6 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
6 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Sources are not documented.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation
