NURS 658 all week discussions latest 2018 may

NURS 658 all week discussions latest 2018 may
Sample Answer for NURS 658 all week discussions latest 2018 may Included After Question

NURS 658 all week discussions latest 2018 may

Week 1 discussion
DQ1 After reviewing the two-system merger case presented
with this week’s assignment, discuss the effects of mergers on integration of
information utilizing the material in this week’s readings. Include security,
privacy, legal implications, and the effects on interoperability.
DQ2 Discuss the interoperability of an electronic health
record (EHR) in your current or past workplace. Provide examples from this
week’s readings about the functions, significance, and factors that affect the
use and implementation of the (EHR).
Week 2 discussion
DQ1 Visit the
website: http://www.hl7.org/newsroom/inthenews.cfm
Select the Newsroom Link at the top of the page. Review the
issues and policies, press releases, in the news, and industry news links.
Discuss one of the topics and how it relates to the content in the course.
DQ2 Select one of the standards discussed in this week’s
assigned reading. Discuss the standard and how it helps achieve
interoperability.
Week 3 discussion
DQ1 Explain how the
Continuity of Care Document (CCD) can help meet meaningful use criteria.
DQ2 Discuss the
purpose of HL7, CDA, and CCD, and how they have influenced current health care.
In your responses, discuss how you see these affecting future informatics
practices or changing over time.
Week 4
discussion
DQ1 Discuss the need
for imaging standards in healthcare informatics. Utilize assigned reading and
resources from this week to support your post.
DQ2 COLLAPSE
Visit the following website and review the PowerPoint
presentation. Then, discuss one of the sections of the CCR presented.
Incorporate course resources to enhance your discussion on the topic.
https://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public_temp_DC462D64-1C23-BA17-0C80B6292410A5DF/calendarofevents/himss/2004/presentations/ContinuityofCareRecord.pdf
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: nurs658 all week discussions latest 2018 may
NURS 658 all week discussions latest 2018 may
Week 5 discussion
DQ1 Visit the following website http://www.nuemd.com/icd-10/codes
and search for “diseases” (for example, infection). Discuss what word you
searched for and what was returned. Were there challenges you noticed with the
specificity of your search keyword? What did you learn and how would you
approach a different search or guide a colleague in future searches?
DQ2 Examine the need to switch to ICD-10; explore challenges
that healthcare organizations are facing in doing so. What have they done to
overcome those challenges? Provide suggestions for future institutions that
desire to switch to ICD-10.
Week 6 discussion
DQ1 Discuss how using a standard terminology like SNOMED CT
helps achieve meaningful use. Use 2–3 specific examples.
DQ2 Review the ISMP List of High-Alert Medications in Acute
Care Settings document at this link:
https://www.ismp.org/tools/highalertmedications.pdf
Complete a search for one of the medications from the ISMP
lList. Discuss your findings (e.g., a search for “digoxin” returns one element
in “ingredient,” three elements in Brand Name, four elements in dose form
group, and 10 elements of “Clinical Drug or Pack”). Share your findings.
You can use
https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/rxnorm/overview.html as an additional
reference.
NURS 658 all week discussions latest 2018 may

Week 7 discussion
DQ1 Discuss an advantage and a disadvantage of using XML in
health information systems. Explain the alternative file formats to XML and how
they differ.
DQ2 Explain the purpose and use of the Unified Medical
Language System (UMLS) and discuss how it influences interoperability.
Week 8 discussion
DQ1 Discuss the advantages of standardizing nursing
languages, and describe how standardized nursing languages are applied in the
clinical setting.
DQ2 Discuss the application of a national EHR. Discuss
whether you support or oppose the concept of national EHRs. Support with
references.

Week 1 discussion
DQ1 After reviewing the two-system merger case presented
with this week’s assignment, discuss the effects of mergers on integration of
information utilizing the material in this week’s readings. Include security,
privacy, legal implications, and the effects on interoperability.
DQ2 Discuss the interoperability of an electronic health
record (EHR) in your current or past workplace. Provide examples from this
week’s readings about the functions, significance, and factors that affect the
use and implementation of the (EHR).
Week 2 discussion
DQ1 Visit the
website: http://www.hl7.org/newsroom/inthenews.cfm
Select the Newsroom Link at the top of the page. Review the
issues and policies, press releases, in the news, and industry news links.
Discuss one of the topics and how it relates to the content in the course.
DQ2 Select one of the standards discussed in this week’s
assigned reading. Discuss the standard and how it helps achieve
interoperability.
Week 3 discussion
DQ1 Explain how the
Continuity of Care Document (CCD) can help meet meaningful use criteria.
DQ2 Discuss the
purpose of HL7, CDA, and CCD, and how they have influenced current health care.
In your responses, discuss how you see these affecting future informatics
practices or changing over time.
Week 4
discussion
DQ1 Discuss the need
for imaging standards in healthcare informatics. Utilize assigned reading and
resources from this week to support your post.
DQ2 COLLAPSE
Visit the following website and review the PowerPoint
presentation. Then, discuss one of the sections of the CCR presented.
Incorporate course resources to enhance your discussion on the topic.
https://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public_temp_DC462D64-1C23-BA17-0C80B6292410A5DF/calendarofevents/himss/2004/presentations/ContinuityofCareRecord.pdf
Week 5 discussion
DQ1 Visit the following website http://www.nuemd.com/icd-10/codes
and search for “diseases” (for example, infection). Discuss what word you
searched for and what was returned. Were there challenges you noticed with the
specificity of your search keyword? What did you learn and how would you
approach a different search or guide a colleague in future searches?
DQ2 Examine the need to switch to ICD-10; explore challenges
that healthcare organizations are facing in doing so. What have they done to
overcome those challenges? Provide suggestions for future institutions that
desire to switch to ICD-10.
Week 6 discussion
DQ1 Discuss how using a standard terminology like SNOMED CT
helps achieve meaningful use. Use 2–3 specific examples.
DQ2 Review the ISMP List of High-Alert Medications in Acute
Care Settings document at this link:
https://www.ismp.org/tools/highalertmedications.pdf
Complete a search for one of the medications from the ISMP
lList. Discuss your findings (e.g., a search for “digoxin” returns one element
in “ingredient,” three elements in Brand Name, four elements in dose form
group, and 10 elements of “Clinical Drug or Pack”). Share your findings.
You can use
https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/rxnorm/overview.html as an additional
reference.
Week 7 discussion
DQ1 Discuss an advantage and a disadvantage of using XML in
health information systems. Explain the alternative file formats to XML and how
they differ.
DQ2 Explain the purpose and use of the Unified Medical
Language System (UMLS) and discuss how it influences interoperability.
Week 8 discussion
DQ1 Discuss the advantages of standardizing nursing
languages, and describe how standardized nursing languages are applied in the
clinical setting.
DQ2 Discuss the application of a national EHR. Discuss
whether you support or oppose the concept of national EHRs. Support with
references.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 658 all week discussions latest 2018 may
Title: NURS 658 all week discussions latest 2018 may
Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category
10
9
8
4
0

Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion

Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.

Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.

Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable

No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable

Performance Category
 10
9
8
4
0

Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.

Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content

Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson

Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life

Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life

Performance Category
 5
4
3
2
0

Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.
(5 points possible per graded thread)

Exceeds minimum post requirements
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty

Has only one post for the week
Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments

Does not post to the thread
No connections are made to the topic

 
Minus 1 Point
Minus 2 Point
Minus 3 Point
Minus 4 Point
Minus 5 Point

Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

2-3 errors in APA format.
Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.

4-5 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is somewhat focused.

6-7 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.

8-10 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.

Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style does not facilitate communication.
The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor

0 points lost
 
 
 
-5 points lost

Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.

The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days

Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.